bon , votre blog site thème est réellement merveilleux , Je suis recherche tout nouveau modèle pour mon moncler doudoune propre personnel blog site, j’aime vôtre, maintenant Je vais à aller recherche le exacte même design !…

fine, votre site modèle est réellement grand, je suis cherchant pour un nouveau thème pour mon moncler doudoune individuels weblog , j’aime vôtre, maintenant Je vais aller chercher le même disposition style !…

For example, if by "closest to the original" you mean "most closely mirrors the original language texts", then you could say that the New American Standard Bible, Young’s Literal Translation or even the New World Translation are closest. However, these types of Bibles (very word-for-word- literal) are "closest" only in the **linguistic** (grammatical) sense, not in the sense that they most accurately convey the *meaning* of the original language text. It is common knowledge among those familiar with language translation that a more word-for-word literal translation *tends* to be a less accurate translation. This may seem counter-intuitive to someone *not* familiar with language translation, but it is true. SO – these versions are very close to the original in *language* but not in so close in *meaning*. They are good if your intent is to do original language word studies or if you are familiar with the original languages (Greek, Aramaic, Hebrew).

At the other end we have very thought-for-thought literal, what is commonly known as a dynamic equivalence translation. Unfortunately, such Bibles are without exception translated for the purpose of being easy-to-read rather than for the purpose of relaying the meaning of the original language text as exactly as possible. "Dumbing down" the language inescapably leads to a loss of **precision**. So: the best (most scholarly) dynamic equivalence Bibles can convey the meaning very *accurately* – but none of the existing ones do so very *precisely*. (To understand the difference, read this)
http://www.bibleselector.com/c_tm_ec.html#Accuracy

That leaves us with what I call the "moderate equivalence" versions. Without going into further detail, these are the best (in order):

New Jerusalem Bible
Revised English Bible
New International Version
New Revised Standard Version

I will be happy to go into much greater detail regarding this subject if you really want to know more details.

Jim
References :

Those were closest to the original.

Α†Ω™
References :

Free your mind before it’s used against you!

/.\
References :